30 Days of Meme - Day Two
Jun. 9th, 2010 12:08 amYour Favourite Film.
As I mentioned I don't have a favourite song. However there is one film I can point to as "Best Film Ever". I feel guilty that I've not seen it in ages, but it is over two hours long, doesn't have any exciting battles in it, and some of the best bits are memorable because they have no dialogue at all.
You just need to hear five notes from Strauss to know which film I mean. Stanley Kubrick and Arthur C. Clarke's 2001: A Space Odyssey. Arthur C. Clarke originally conceived of the two works (the book and the film) as two versions of the same story. In The Lost Worlds of 2001, he -only half jokingly- talks about the book as being by Clarke and Kubrick, and reverses the names for the film credits. However as is so often the case films get delayed and the book came out several years before the film did.
I first saw it when I was about 7. And I've loved it ever since.
As always lots of people have come up with all sorts of ideas about what its about, reading meaning into every frame. Frankly I can't be arsed with that. Its a cracking story about a computer that becomes unhinged. And I think I prefer not knowing what the monolith means. As with the other Arthur C. Clarke book about big mysterious objects Rendezvous with Rama the sequels, where you find out much more about what the object does, somehow take away from the original mystery. Its a sort of a reverse of Richard Feynman's quote (which I heartily agree with) about how understanding more about a flower only adds to its beauty.
But anyway, enough waffling, you want to see why. Well, frankly there are too many awesome scenes. The interviews, the "stargate" scene, the men in suits that inexplicably lost the Oscar to Planet of the Apes, etc. But for me there's one stand out scene. If you don't know which one it is then watch this...
As I mentioned I don't have a favourite song. However there is one film I can point to as "Best Film Ever". I feel guilty that I've not seen it in ages, but it is over two hours long, doesn't have any exciting battles in it, and some of the best bits are memorable because they have no dialogue at all.
You just need to hear five notes from Strauss to know which film I mean. Stanley Kubrick and Arthur C. Clarke's 2001: A Space Odyssey. Arthur C. Clarke originally conceived of the two works (the book and the film) as two versions of the same story. In The Lost Worlds of 2001, he -only half jokingly- talks about the book as being by Clarke and Kubrick, and reverses the names for the film credits. However as is so often the case films get delayed and the book came out several years before the film did.
I first saw it when I was about 7. And I've loved it ever since.
As always lots of people have come up with all sorts of ideas about what its about, reading meaning into every frame. Frankly I can't be arsed with that. Its a cracking story about a computer that becomes unhinged. And I think I prefer not knowing what the monolith means. As with the other Arthur C. Clarke book about big mysterious objects Rendezvous with Rama the sequels, where you find out much more about what the object does, somehow take away from the original mystery. Its a sort of a reverse of Richard Feynman's quote (which I heartily agree with) about how understanding more about a flower only adds to its beauty.
But anyway, enough waffling, you want to see why. Well, frankly there are too many awesome scenes. The interviews, the "stargate" scene, the men in suits that inexplicably lost the Oscar to Planet of the Apes, etc. But for me there's one stand out scene. If you don't know which one it is then watch this...